Saturday, 13 December 2014

(SURE-P) is a mere political gimmick- Chief Bayo Ogunmupe

(SURE-P) is a mere political gimmick- Chief Bayo Ogunmupe


ogunmupe 


YEMI OLAKITAN
Bayode Ogunmupe is a veteran journalist, economist and literary critic. He was Educated at the University of Ibadan; University of Geneva and the London School of Economics, UK; he holds degrees in History, Economics and Business. Ogunmupe has been Political Editor, Daily Sketch; Production Editor, Nigerian Tribune; Senior Sub Editor, Daily Times; Associate Editor, Newswatch and Economic columnist and literary critic for The Guardian. He was a recipient of the Nigerian Media Merit Awards in 1993 and the Ladi Lawal Journalist of the Year Award in 2010. He is the author of the international bestseller, Nigerian Politics in the age of Yar’Adua. Ogunmupe dismissed SURE-P as mere political campaign tool. Excerpts:
·         What is your opinion about SURE-P? There are reports that people are benefiting from it.
It is a mere political design, a gimmick. It is not true that people are benefiting from it. I have a personal experience with SURE-P. I applied for business loan and I was not given. They didn’t give it to me for any justification. My business was properly registered.  
It was like a small business. They were supposed to fund it.  The conditions were you should have a registered company, a business plan; both of which I had and I was not given the funding. I also tried applied for one of my sister in law who was unemployed at the time. She is a university graduate and it was the same experience.
I thought that may be, it was because of the women, men women gender disparity but the woman was not given also. She has a good education. She studied Accountancy so she could do something.  Why did Christopher Kolade who was former chairman of this committee resigned. It was because nothing tangible was happening there that could reach ordinary Nigerians.  
·         It was just propaganda?
It is just a propaganda stunt. They created it to score political points.  It is purely a Political propaganda and even a way to embezzle money that is why Dr. Kolade resigned as chairman so there is nothing in it. If it is good project why did Kolade resigned.
·         As an economist, do you think it would work if it was properly implemented?
It is a good way to stop unemployment and poverty. It is a good way, if it is properly run. it is the kind plan that was implement in the United States in 1948 after the second world war which bought up the European nations back to normalcy.
 If It will be done but it is going to be done by an agency independent of government such as INEC,  devoid of bureaucracy that goes on in civil service oriented organization or a bank.
Yes actually you can, through the SURE-P, give loans to Nigerians through the banks. They can give loans, without interest, collateral free. You can give any Nigerian that is qualified to do business. This will encourage entrepreneurship truly help to eradicate poverty.
 It could work but the people are not sincere. They could have created a plan that can encourage entrepreneurship, but the Nigeria factor is always there.  People are not ready to work sincerely for the development of the nation. They are ready to work it. The belief is that, what is in it for me, what can I steal?
What about the issue that led to the creation of SURE- P?
What led to it was this man, the former Central Bank Governor, Lamido Sanusi exposed subsidy as farce.  He exposed subsidy as a farce and that People were using subsidy to steal money from the Federal Government.  They discovered he was right so the government wanted to compensate the people for removing the subsidy so they establish SURE-P to compensate the people.
Was the removal of subsidy actually justified?
Yes, it was, Yes for me, economically, subsidy is always corruption. It is a way to steal money. The World Bank is against subsidy of any form because it is always a way for government to steal money so the best thing Jonathan has ever done was to privatize electricity.
If President Goodluck Jonathan wants to do something for Nigerians, It will be to create  bank products backed up by SURE-P which allows people, Nigerians to obtain loans without collateral, loans without interests and without discrimination.
There should only be three factors to qualify a person for the loan; anyone who is 21 years of age, anyone who is a Nigerian citizen, and is properly registered, once those factors are available, the person should be able to access a loan.  
This is what President Goodluck Jonathan needs to do. Get a banking product available to all Nigerians who are passionate about business and entrepreneurship. This would be supervised by the central bank of Nigeria.
Let the Federal Republic of Nigeria ensure that anybody who is a Nigerian citizen has access to it. All these SURE- P is a complete waste of money. Some people just want to embezzle money.
it appears as a good plan but the Nigeria factor is always there. Give loans to Nigerians who wants to do business. You can give between 1million to ten million particularly import substitution enterprise.


Can u buttress that point?
Import substitution enterprises involve all things Nigerian imports. You can now tell those companies Nigeria import from to service two or three Nigerian companies and to help them to be able to produce those things in Nigeria.  In the next 10 years you can now make it a law, if a company is not doing that you blacklist it. Make credit facility available for all Nigerians who want to participate in such a venture within three years poverty will be gone in this country.  This is all they need to do. President Jonathan is thinking about second term no sincerity. He is just doing this project for the sake of second term ambition. He wants to bribe the people deceived them so that they can vote for him


How sure is Sure-P?


BY YEMI OLAKITAN 


In 2012, the Federal Government had explained that subsidy removal was necessary to end the vast corruption taking place under the subsidy regime, and promised to reinvest the saved money into infrastructure, health and education. The government had to introduce a partial subsidy as a result of widespread protests that took place against the subsidy removal, and set up a fund into which the saved money would be channeled. 

This fund was called, the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) it was charged with using the subsidy savings to invest in infrastructure and empowerment initiatives that benefit Nigerians.  With $2.5 billion having flowed into the project – and a further $1.6 billion in 2014 – what has SURE-P achieved so far? Ag. Head of Investigations, Yemi Olakitan takes a critical look at the programme, examining the controversies.


On Monday, 2 January 2012 in response to the removal of the subsidy on oil  by the Federal Government of President Jonathan on Sunday, 1 January 2012, widespread protests took place across the country. The protests was tagged Occupy Nigeria. 16 people were reportedly killed during the protests. The protest was characterized by demonstrations.
The country  is said to be the largest producer of crude oil in Africa, but still imports fuel despite producing about 2.4 million barrels of crude oil daily which is exported to be refined abroad and exported back into the country. American states person, Hilary Clinton, during a visit to Nigeria described the situation as ‘‘a clear case of mismanagement.’’

 Cheap petrol is regarded as the only benefit Nigerians receives from the state, hence the widespread disapproval. Governor of the CBN  Lamido Sanusi said the subsidy was unsustainable". The government explained that subsidy regime in which fixed prices are maintained irrespective of market realities has resulted in a huge unsustainable subsidy burden. Fuel subsidies do not reach the intended beneficiaries. Subsidy level is correlated with household income, as richer households consume larger quantities of the products.

According to the Federal Government at the time, subsidy administration is beset with inefficiencies, leakages and corruption. Subsidy has resulted in the diversion of scarce public resources away from investment in critical infrastructure, while putting pressure on government resources.  Subsidy has discouraged competition and stifled private investment in the downstream sector. Due to lack of deregulation, investors have shied away from investment in the development of refineries, petrochemicals, fertilizer plants, etc. Investigations reveal that since the year 2000, government has issued 20 licenses for new refineries, none of which has materialized into new refineries. The deregulation of the downstream sector of the petroleum industry, it was argued will lead to private sector investment in refineries and petrochemicals, which will generate millions of jobs and bring prosperity.
Huge price disparity has encouraged smuggling of petroleum products across the borders to neighboring countries, where prices are much higher. Nigeria therefore ends up subsidizing consumption of petroleum products in neighboring countries. Despite the explanations given, protesters refuse to cooperate with the government. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo had tried to remove the subsidy but have backed down because of protests and reduced it instead.
As part of palliatives aimed at cushioning the effects of the subsidy removal, the federal government had announced a ‘massive transportation scheme’ about 1600 diesel-powered mass transit vehicles, was promised to be distributed. In a similar vein, President Good luck Jonathan established the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme, SURE-P as a palliative measure. He inaugurated a committee to manage the Programme. The Committee had the following membership: Dr. Christopher Kolade, CON Chairman, Gen. Martin Luther Agwai (Rtd) - Deputy Chairman, Hon Minister of Finance/CME Member, Hon. Minister of Petroleum Resources Member,  Hon. Minister National Planning Member, Hon. Minister of State Health Member, Prof. Kunle Ade Wahab  and others. 
The president explained that The Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Program (SURE-P) is an intervention mechanism for the nation’s development.
 ‘‘I inaugurated the board of the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) under the leadership of Dr. Christopher Kolade. I also had the great privilege of kicking off the Public Works Women and Youth Empowerment Programme which is an intervention programme designed to employ 370,000 youths in the year 2012 with 30% of those jobs being reserved for women. This programme will also place young graduates as interns in firms and companies with a view to sharpening their skills preparatory to engaging in entrepreneurship and those firms that choose to retain these graduates will be given incentives by the Federal Government. This is only one step in government's plan to provide the enabling environment for all willing Nigerians to get to work and compliments the Youth Enterprise with Innovation in Nigeria (You Win) initiative which I launched on the 11th of October 2011.’’
According to the PDP led Jonathan’s Government, the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme was designed to mitigate the immediate impact of the partial petroleum subsidy removal on the population by laying a foundation for the successful development of a national safety net programme that targets the poor and vulnerable on a continuous basis.

Regrettably, SURE-P has been trailed by one controversy or the other. Chief of them was the N2.2billion SURE-P fund reportedly used for secretarial services and another N500 billion allegedly missing. According to the then Chairman, Christopher Kolade of the Sure-P committee who later resigned on the ground of old age, the media had promoted the inaccurate story that such an amount was missing from the fund. The former chairman said in an interview that it was all a widely celebrated rumour, he said,   ‘I have a grouse against the media. First of all, if you look at our accounts, our budget; you will find the amount earmarked for secretariat services, in order words, for running our offices and staff, etc nationwide for 2012. It was only N1billion, so if anybody is going to spend more than N1 billion on the secretariat, he has to go back to the National Assembly to get funds from other places to supplement the N1 billion. So, we did not have N2.2 billion. What has happened; we put down our reports to the National Assembly that so far, to that point, we had spent N220 million on secretariat services. Somebody in National Assembly read that to mean N2.2 billion. When we went to National Assembly and they said how come you spent N2.2 billion for secretariat services, I said where is that? And they said we should look at our account. We said, no, read it properly, it’s N220million. Members of the media were there. When the publications started, it was N2.2 billion they published. They did not attend to the correction that we made that it was N220 million. Until now, we are still talking about N2.2 billion. I don’t know what else my committee should do to correct this and therefore, I go back to what I said about the N500 billion allegedly missing. There are mischief makers here. There are people who are deliberately spreading wrong information because they want to create confusion.’’

Critics also accused the SURE-P of duplicating projects and defrauding the nation by making double payments for projects already embarked upon and financed by the various ministries and agencies. The National Assembly had also took a swipe at the  Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P), describing it as a drain pipe on the Nigerian economy, it called on the government to scrap it if there were no improvements. The Lawmakers who expressed their lack of confidence on the activities of SURE-P stressed that the agency was a duplication of activities already carried out by existing Ministries, Department and Agencies, MDAs in the country.

The former chairman Dr. Christopher Kolade, CON who later resigned, citing old age, had explained that the SURE-P’s funds are split between the Federal Government and States and Local Government, and are used in two ways: to help fund infrastructural development; and to support social security programmes related to issues such as women and youth empowerment, unemployment, and community service. He also said the programme was an intervention mechanism aimed at helping out on government’s abandoned projects or improving on them.

Investigations revealed that, when the National Assembly asked SURE-P in November 2012 to produce its 2012 budget expenditure analysis, lawmakers were dismayed to hear that lots of the things SURE-P committee members pointed to were projects already being carried out by the Federal Government. The SURE-P board claimed to have spent N16 billion ($100 million) on the Benin Ore Shagamu road – a project for which the Federal Government had already awarded a N65.2 billion ($400 million) contract in September 2012 – and said it had contributed N9.3 billion ($57 million) to the Lagos-to-Ibadan railway – a development for which a $1.4 billion contract was signed between the Federal Government and the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) in August 2012.  Senator Danjuma Goje, a member of the Senate Committee on Petroleum said, “They are not initiating any new projects, they only put money into existing projects.”
Furthermore, reports reveal that SURE-P had come under heavy suspicion of succumbing to corruption. The Kaduna State House Assembly was reported to have ordered the suspension of SURE-P in the state and constituted a committee to investigate the implementation of SURE-P’s state projects and activities. Allegations of dubious transactions and misappropriation were leveled against the programme coordinators in the state with a reported N560 million ($3.1 million) missing from the Kaduna State SURE-P coffers. 

“My opinion is this, the SURE-P programme appeared well thought through,’’ said Ezekiel Keith, who described himself as a social critic, he said, ‘SURE- P is a well structured programme that can benefit Nigerians but like always we are plagued with the Nigeria factor. ‘‘All we have seen are fine buses in Abuja, the federal capital.’’  He said, ‘‘the committee needs to do more to improve the living conditions of Nigerians in the grassroots across the nation. Millions of young Nigerians are still unemployed.’’
Dr Christopher Kolade speaking on the activities of SURE-P said the programme has been misunderstood by most Nigerians. Dr. Christopher Kolade said it is an interventionist project.

‘‘I do not know why most people are misunderstanding the word ‘’intervention.’’ The normal programme of government will be going on. How did this intervention come about? The federal government decided to de-regulate the petroleum industry.  It is the oil subsidy that provides the fund with which SURE-P carries out its project. You know that government at the beginning wanted to withdraw the entire subsidy but when there were protests, government did a partial withdrawal, so that the petroleum we have been buying N65 per litre now became N97 per litre, there was an increase of N32. We will now use the money they withdraw on meaningful projects. Government has decided what to do with the money. The money that was now going to accrue will be shared to the states and local governments. For 2012, it was calculated to amount to N180b. The federal government defines the projects we embark upon. There is a document called the SURE-P programme which guides the projects we embark upon.  Most of these projects are in categories; components.’’ he said.

 Speaking further, he said, ‘‘I have seen a lot of media comments almost insinuating that we are doing wrong projects or that we don’t know what we are doing. No, it is not true, we are an intervention body, we can only intervene the way government said we should do. The state and the Local Governments of the Federation have their own SURE-P budget and they are in sole control of it. The beneficiaries on our scheme are private sector operators as we are Federal Government Scheme; hence we operate independently from state and local government,’’ he said.
Dr, Kolade explained the committee’s involvement in road contraction. According to him, this focuses on accelerating the completion of the long standing East – West Road by the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs (MNDA). The 338km road connects the following towns in the Niger Delta, South-South Zone:  Effurun/Warri – Ughelli – Patani – Kaiama – Mbiama – Ahoada – Elele  – Emouha  –  Choba – Port Harcourt – Onne – Ogoni – Eket  – Oron and Calabar. The SURE-P funds is managed by The Infrastructure Bank (TIB), they are responsible for monitoring the loans and payment to suppliers and operators.  Sure-P intervention in the rail subsector i.e. for the three main projects, covers: The rehabilitation of the Western line (Jebba – Kano Line Rehabilitation Project); The rehabilitation of the Eastern Line (Port Harcourt – Maiduguri Rehabilitation Project); The Nigerian Railway Modernization Project (Abuja (Idu) – Kaduna, Addendum I, Segment I)). The Western line rehabilitation consists of two (2) contracts, namely:  Contract I – Lagos – Jebba, and Jebba – Kano.  The Eastern Line Rehabilitation consists of three (3) contracts, namely: Contract 3 – Port Harcourt – Makurdi, Contract 4 – Makurdi – Kuru, Contract 7 – Kuru – Maiduguri.  There is also the Modernization Project like in Contract (1) (Idu – Kaduna), SURE-P also focuses on the completion of core road projects by the Federal Ministry of Works, spread across the six geo-political zones of Nigeria.


On his dissatisfaction with SURE-P, the Chairman of the joint Committee, Senator Magnus Abe, PDP, Rivers South-East said, “From the details presented before us here, it is believed that the performance of your 2012 budget was put at only 31 percent. You have to sit up in 2013; else, Nigerians will start losing interest in you.  Our fears are not with your credibility, but the fact that these main roads are the same also awarded by the Federal Ministry of Works during this period. The committee said however that unless the organization provides its full details of 2012 dealings, it would not debate the 2013 budget and therefore directed the chairman, Dr Christopher Kolade to furnish it with the details before it considers the next sitting date to debate on the budget.

It has also been alleged that SURE-P is well intentioned programme but is being poeticized and given a bad name by opposition politicians and that some APC states are not giving SURE-P enough public awareness in their domain yet they draw huge amount of money every month from the proceeds from the subsidy removal. They keep quiet about the gains accruing from partial fuel subsidy removal, whereas state and local governments appropriate funds from subsidy removal on a monthly basis and the federal government is ploughing back its own portion into various states and the local governments through SURE-P.

As a result the management of the Subsidy Re-investment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) has become a subject of accusation and counter-accusation between the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN). Cleric and politician, the General Overseer of Latter Rain Assembly, Pastor Tunde Bakare said SURE-P is another drain pipe of the country’s economy embarked upon by President Goodluck Jonathan.
Bakare said: “If people are saying that PDP is sharing the subsidy reinvestment fund, I would not be surprised. If PDP does not share the money, who will? Do you think the PDP has good intentions? I felt pity for Kolade when he was appointed to head that committee. In response, a chieftain of the PDP in Ekiti State and former South-West publicity secretary of the party, Mr. Kayode Babade, said the ACN goofed on the issue at stake.  “It is nonsense for ACN to accuse PDP on a programme it did not have the fact on how it is being operated.’’  

Public Relations Officer of the SURE-P committee, Mr. Adelani Ashamu, said it was unfortunate that the ACN failed to ask its governors what they did with their 54 percent of SURE-P funds accrued to their states every month before poke nosing into that of the Federal Government activities. Ashamu pointed out that the Federal Government used its own share of SUPE-P funds (41 per cent) as an intervention on infrastructural projects like roads across the country and re-vamping of rail system.
According to former Chairman Christopher Kolade, SURE-P also started a Graduate Internship Scheme, and the Maternity and Child’s Healthcare programme. It trained about 4,000 midwives to deliver maternal services to pregnant women and to people in childbirth.

‘‘This is an intervention mechanism. People must remember that the business of government is ongoing. In fact, the area that SURE-P intervenes in does not represent the totality of government activity. For instance, we are not doing anything on housing, we are not doing anything on maritime. Government activity is going on all the time but this SURE-P money is money that was not in the normal budget. So government has decided to use it to supplement what they are doing with the normal budget. So for instance, if you take any road construction in which we have now come to intervene, what we do is to say, according to the budget of the ministry of works, how far have you gone with this road already? Let’s say the totality is 200 kilometres and they tell us they have done 70 kilometres. The question we pose is how much will your budget do in the next 12 months and they tell us they can do another 25 kilometres, we then go from that point, we now apply our own funds to continue. We don’t change contractors because that means you are doing something new, the contractors are ready to do this work, but the pace of funding has been slow, so we say to the contractors that okay, we are now going to12 months give you more money, so although you have said you will do only 95, how far can you go if we are able to give you another N40 billion? And they say in the next 12 months we can do another 50 kilometres. We are concerned with only 50 kilometres. So it’s not a duplication, it is supplementary, that is why it is an intervention,’’ he said.

A Nigerian, name with held, while criticizing SURE-P graduate internship programmes said, ‘‘3000 young people in paid N10, 000 employments for one year! What exactly is that waste of money for? What happens after the one year? What kind of short sighted policy is that? after almost an identical spend during the poverty alleviation scheme. How about set up loans - or guarantee loans for green - field business, so that actual businesses can start and employ this youths for periods far in excess of one year and still pay back to the government?  Money given to companies to employ youths for internship programme - who thought up this scheme? What happens after the government stops paying the money? Was there any form of policy analysis before this was adopted? How about an easier to manage and less prone to corruption, tax breaks for companies that employ Nigerian graduates. It is less prone to my paying my cronies for fiction internships and could be managed through existing tax laws using the universities and the NYSC scheme. 

 Community members travelling around to visit road projects- really? Are these committee members trained Engineers? What would they know about the quality of a road project? What happened to the Engineers trained and employed by the Ministry of Works?’’ he quarried.   In furtherance of the mandate given to the committee, President Goodluck Jonathan early this year appointed Gen. Martin Luther Agwai (rtd) as the substantive chairman of the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) Gen. Martin Agwai (rtd.) was until then the Deputy Chairman and Acting Chairman of SURE-P.  Dr. Kolade had resigned citing old age.  Agwai is currently the chairman of the Committee and has continued the federal government’s efforts aimed at reinvesting the subsidy removal fund into infrastructure and empowerment projects across the nation.  In the words of Ezekiel Keith, ‘‘one can only hope that the controversies will end so that meaningful progress can be achieved.’’

 
   
    


Monday, 1 December 2014

DISCOS’ prepaid meters: Waiting for Godot

DISCOS’ prepaid meters: Waiting for Godot




When it was revealed by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) that electricity consumers would now use prepaid meters instead of the estimated billing system, many heaved a sigh of relief. However, Nigerians have been plagued with disappointments as the promised meters have refused to come. The consumers have continued to complain about the situation and it seems there is no solution in sight. Ag. Head of Investigations, Yemi Olakitan, examines the issues.



Electricity generation began in the country in 1896, specifically in Lagos when the first power plant was built. However, over the years, population has increased more than electricity supply can catch up with in the country. Reforms aimed at meeting the demands of Nigerians have not changed the situation of power in the country while neibouring and smaller countries such as Ghana and Benin Republic are enjoying uninterrupted power supply. Nigerians can only hope and dream. The major reforms really began in 2001 when former president Olusegun Obasanjo set up the National Electric Power Policy. The National Electric Power Authority, NEPA, was then renamed the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) with the formation of 18 companies. In his first 100 days in office, which began on May 29, 2007, having been sworn in as Nigeria’s President and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua made major public policy pronouncements concerning the perilous state of Nigeria’s energy and power sectors respectively. He pledged to improve the existing poor state of power generation capacity in the sector by declaring a state of emergency on the sector.
However, the situation remained the same until his demise. When President Goodluck Jonathan came on board, he also set up the Presidential Action Committee on Power (PACP), which plays a major role in reforming the sector. The PACP provides an oversight of the implementation of reforms in the sector. President Jonathan created the Power Sector Reform Roadmap which led to the construction of new plants. He also pursued the privatisation of the generating plants (GENCOs) and the distribution companies (DISCOs) believing that when they are in the hands of private companies, electricity generation and distribution will greatly improve.
The government succeeded in getting the GENCOS and DISCOS privatised despite the Labour movement’s resistance. The ownership of these companies was transferred in November 1, 2013 and the government assured Nigerians that meters would be distributed free to consumers to ensure accurate billings for domestic and industrial consumption.
Later on, Nigerians were asked to pay between N25, 000 and N50, 000 for prepaid meters under the Credited Advance Pay for Metering Implementation (CAPMI) scheme.
The exercise raised hullabaloos, still many paid to get the meters installed while others exchanged their old meters for the new one. A few Nigerians are using the prepaid meters while the majority are still awaiting the new prepaid meters which according to experts are far better than the estimated billing system which is being practised by distribution companies.
The introduction of the prepaid meters, according to reports, will ensure that Nigerians are set free from the era of indiscriminate bills by officials of the Power Holding Company using the estimated billing system. This is why the introduction of the prepaid meters was greeted with great hope and relief. However, Nigerians are yet to have the prepaid meters that were promised them. They have continued to suffer epileptic power supply amid huge electricity bills.
Investigations by Sunday Mirror reveals that the prepaid meter if introduced would need to be credited with funds of the subscriber before the consumer will have access to electricity. The estimated billing system which is currently used by the distribution companies allows the subscriber to start using electricity from day one even without paying for it. This way, the practice of bribery for free electricity can be sustained and distribution companies can continue to bring outrageous bills to consumers even when they do not enjoy the electricity.
Reports revealed that a prepaid meter system has far more numerous advantages over the estimated billing system. This includes allowing the subscriber to only pay for what he can afford in advance and so it is budgetfriendly. The estimated billing system doesn’t control what the subscriber uses and it is less budget-friendly since a consumer could use more than he budgeted.
Another benefit of prepaid meter billing system is that it encourages savings on electricity consumption. One can choose not to use electricity for a period and in this way minimise his bills. The bills one may have to pay may be the service or maintenance bills which are at a flat monthly fee. The estimated billing meter system doesn’t encourage savings on electricity consumption since there is always a monthly fee to be paid for electricity supply whether power was available or not.
In a chat with Adesina Idris, the supervisor of Alesh Hotel, Lekki, he said, “The officials bring exorbitant bills to us every month and we have to pay otherwise our light will be disconnected. They did not even approve the prepaid meter for us. We have the estimated billing meter and we are paying a lot of money on that. This last money we paid was about N530, 000. Our bill usually starts from N350, 000 per month. We have been saying that this bill is exorbitant even though we call their boss, the ‘Oga of the NEPA’. They say he is on leave. They are using it for business. Anyone working with them can arrange something like that every month. The least bill they give us here is N350, 000. In fact, we have been paying our profits to this people. It’s crazy we have requested for the prepaid meters but they have refused to give us. The bills are too much even if we resort to our own generators we still have to pay. This thing is on a monthly basis. It is killing business; with the estimated billing system these officials no longer read the meters but they just ensure that people pay a fee every month and this has been increasing over the years. Government should do something about it; electricity should be more affordable. These are the remote causes of unemployment in the country. If the cost of staying in business is too high, many people will close the business and then there would be unemployment. This is the problem we face and it is killing the economic situation. The prepaid billing meter should have been made available to all,’’
In 2007, many Nigerian consumers of electricity believed the solution to ending the headache of estimated billing on the old post-paid meters was to apply for a pre-paid meter. But five years after, they are more disillusioned than ever. However they still get outrageous bills every month even when power supply is not commensurate. Many paid for a prepaid meter before the privatisation of PHCN. Till today, no meter has been given to them. Every month, they get outrageous bills. The situation is compounded by the irregular and inadequate power supply.
In another chat with Mrs. Florence Akereja, she said, “In my compound, we have paid money twice to the officials. .The first time we paid the money, we waited for so long expecting them to come and install the meter. Later they said the man to do so has been transferred. Another official came and promised us heaven and earth that the prepaid meter will be brought to us. We contributed money; there are about 10 families in our compound. It is absolutely a residential home. Till today, we are yet to receive the prepaid meter and we don’t know why.”
Investigations by Sunday Mirror reveal that consumers prefer the prepaid meter to the estimated billing meter system but many do not have it neither do they know how to get one.
In another chat with Mr. Babatunde Adisa, Managing Director/CEO, Bamaja Entertainment which includes a hotel, restaurant and cinema in the heart of Ebute Metta, Lagos, he said, his company spends so much money on diesel for our generators.
“If we add the amount we spend on generators to the electricity bills we pay, you will discover that it comes very difficult to pay salaries to our workers. It is only by the grace of God that we are surviving in business. Speaking on the benefits of the prepaid meter, he said it allows for privacy because all you need is to buy the recharge cards and then load it in your meter. There would be no need for company officials to visit your home or office just to record the last meter reading before issuing a bill. The prepaid billing also does not give room for bribery and corruption. There is no need for one to bribe any official; it is what you use that you pay for. It is just like loading cards in your GSM phones. It will also benefit the companies in the sense that it reduces their cost of operations. There would be no need to have hundreds of officials who manually go about to read meters from house to house. It pays both sides of the bargain. The actual point we are now is that some people have the meter and the majority do not have it,’’ he said.
In a discussion with Mr., James Xavier, an IT professional on the benefits of the prepaid billing system, he said, ‘‘Landlords and tenants no longer have to worry that their power will be cut by the PHCN officials when bills are past due since they can be paid in advance under the prepaid billing system. The incidence of bribery among electricity consumers and the power company officials is drastically reduced. Under the whole system, consumers who have not paid bills tend to bribe the company officials in order to enjoy free electricity and this doesn’t help the organisations generate the income due to it; even the growing complaints from consumers about over-estimated or ‘crazy’ billing can come to an end. NERC needs to step up its game and keep the DISCOS on their toes in making the necessary investment to ensure a robust metering of customers and curb the wild estimated billing. A prepaid meter is an electricity meter which only provides the subscriber with power after payment has been made. This can be in the form of a meter token or credit purchased prior to use. If this is done, we would have put an end to the era of crazy electricity bills in Nigeria.”
According to a report by NERC, the metering gap in the Nigerian electricity market is big, with about 50 per cent of consumers being without meters. Investigations reveal that there is growing demand for prepaid meters by consumers, but the new investors in the electricity distribution companies (DISCOS) have done very little to make prepaid meters available to consumers who are willing and ready to buy. Based on the proposals submitted by the core investors of the DISCOS, about 6.52 million new meters would be installed over five years, meaning more than one million would be installed yearly. The situation on the ground reveals that the DISCOS are far away from this goal as many consumers are still waiting for the prepaid meters.
In a reaction to consumers’ complaints, the Chairman of the Ikeja Electricity Distribution Company (IKEDC), Mr Abiodun Ajifowobaje, revealed that no fewer than 43,000 prepaid meters have been tampered with by their owners out of 134,000 installed by the company in the last five years. This stunning figure represents about 32 per cent of the total number of the item managed by the electricity company. According to him, those engaging in such practices pay less on power, while the bulk of the power they consume is not being paid for.
“When people tamper with the prepaid meter, it’s difficult to know because the meter will still be reading but not accurately. It is only through careful finding that such practice can be unconverted. 6,000 prepaid meters were currently in store, and would be allocated to customers that had made deposits for them. Applicants for prepaid meters that have yet to make any deposits will benefit from the next phase,” he said.
On estimated billing, Ajifowobaje stated that the company was following the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission’s directives.
However, a consumer who craved anonymity said, ‘‘Prepaid meters are being used globally even in poor West African countries without problems, but here in Nigeria, we are still wandering in oblivion. It is time we put in the right perspective as far as electricity supply is concerned. Byepassing meter is a crime, be it the analog or the prepaid. It should be punished severely. But estimate billing is worse. It is exploitation and fraudulent. Meters are the property of DISCOS. Consumers pay monthly meter maintenance charge of N750. This too is an aberration where there is no functional meter or meter reading. Neither the Electric Power Sector Reform Act 2005 nor the Metering Regulations code of NCC requires that it must be a prepaid meter, but we cannot choose to be outdated while the nation is moving forward.’’
The Eko Electricity Distribution Company, EKEDC, on its part blamed the delay in the rolling out of prepaid meters to consumers on the fear of bye-pass of its meters. The company’s Vice President, Legal, Mrs. Wola Ojoye, said that bypassing of payment for electricity consumed was evident mostly with prepaid meters.
She said this fear has been responsible for the company’s inability to distribute the 9,000 prepaid meters it inherited from the defunct PHCN when it took over on November 1, 2013, adding that these meters go into negative use after consumption of electricity already paid for by the consumers.
She said the company was prepared to partner with manufacturers of best quality prepaid meters that would not be bypassed by its consumers, stressing that whether such meters were locally made or imported was not the issue.
Ojoye said EKEDC has a plan to roll out meters in the country, noting that the plan has already been forwarded to the electricity sector regulators, NERC, in Abuja for their approval. She said the company met enormous problems when it took over, stressing that what EKEDC met was not what it was told.
The Federal Government and electricity workers have been divided over the cause of the inability of the PHCN to ensure effective metering of its customers across the country. The government had earlier through NERC promised to distribute the meters free and then made a U-turn when it said the meters must now be procured by customers. The National Union of Electricity Employees (NUEE) blamed the government’s action as the cause of the scarcity.
Minister of State for Power, Zainab Ibrahim Kuchi, however, absolved the government of wrongdoing on the issue. Kuchi said paying for the meters was necessary, because government could not afford to pay for the meters. She added that the money for meters was not included in the appropriation bill, and that any customer who paid for a meter would be compensated over time; such customers would get energy credit and reduction in their fixed charges over time. The National Secretary of the union, Joe Ajero, however, lamented the inability of the Federal Government to build meter manufacturing companies, which he blamed for NERC’s inconsistent pronouncements on the prepaid meter payment. He said, most of the meters that were in use across the country were being imported by government, a situation that had contributed to the scarcity.
However, investigations reveal that earlier in the year, a consortium of companies in the country had sealed Memorandum of Understanding with some Chinese group of investors for the assembling and manufacturing of the prepaid power meters. The deal was reportedly consummated at the headquarters of the Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment, in Abuja and was facilitated by the Nigeria – China Business Council led by its National Coordinator, Mr. Matthew Uwakwe. A statement from the ministry stated that the agreement was signed by representatives of Skydeep International limited, Mattek Oil Services Limited, Temps Engineering and Gestric Limited, Craag Nigeria limited, JMET Corporation and Jiangsu Sainty International Group. The objective of the agreement was to facilitate financing, procurement and operation of independent power plant projects as well as the local assembly and manufacturing of prepaid power meter, assembly and manufacturing of recharge cards and setting up of skill acquisition centres for capacity building.
Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Power, Amb. Godknows Igali, said local manufacturing of meters was a priority for government since the government hoped to provide meters for all Nigerians.
However, another customer, Pastor Clement Ofunoye, said he successfully procured the prepaid meter for his home about five years ago and he has been using it since then.
‘‘Though the complaints made by many consumers are real. Some of us still have the prepaid meters in our homes,’’ said the cleric.
According to him, his experience on the prepaid meters has been positive.
‘‘I have not had any negative complaints. The process is like the GSM phones. It is what you pay for that you will use. It is a better system. I hope the Federal Government will live up to its promises and make the meters available to all Nigerians because it is the way to go. A situation where some have and others do not is not advisable. This makes the (DISCOS) use one system for some and another system for others. We are all Nigerians. The constitution guarantees our freedoms and welfare in our country. It is high time we got it right when it comes to electricity in Nigeria because without electricity the country cannot move forward as it should. Nigeria must take her rightful place in the comity of nations; we must achieve uninterrupted electricity and it starts from simple matters like the meters. If we cannot get simple things such as meters right, what happens to bigger ones such as electricity generation, ’’ he asked.

About Ojude Oba festival

 The Ojude Oba festival is an annual celebration by the Yoruba people of Ijebu-Ode, a major town in Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria. This v...