Pilgrimage to Jerusalem: Tourism or Spirituality?

YEMI OLAKITAN

Today, many Christians have made pilgrimages to Jerusalem a part of Christian religious exercise. In 2013, even President Goodluck Jonathan was on a Christian Pilgrimage to Israel. He was among many other pilgrims at the Wailing walls in Israel. However, some have argued that the Bible does not prescribe a holy pilgrimage for Christians; hence the practice is not biblical. Senior Correspondent, Yemi Olakitan, examines the subject.

Not long ago, President of Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Pastor Ayo Oritsejafor, while on a visit to President Goodluck Jonathan asked the President to make pilgrimage to Jerusalem an annual duty to enable him continue to seek for spiritual guidance in the governance of the country.

According to him, “Mr. President should make the Presidential pilgrimage and "A Day with Jesus in Jerusalem" an annual event as the spiritual benefits of that exercise to our dear nation and its people are immeasurable”.

The Encyclopedia Britannica, describes pilgrimage as a journey undertaken for a religious purpose. A Christian pilgrimage is described as a pilgrimage or journey made by Christians to places which have moral or spiritual significance.

The question that then arises is: What is the significance of holy pilgrimage to the Christian faith? Does it have any spiritual relevance in the Scripture or is it merely another tourist exercise?

In a chat with Deaconess Shola Abimbola of the Global Church of the Living God, Ajah, Lagos, she said: ‘‘Christians undertake pilgrimages to Jerusalem because most events in the life of Jesus Christ happened in and around the city. These places include the Garden of Gethsemane, Golgotha, the Upper room where he appeared after resurrection to His disciples and His tomb”. She however said the practice of pilgrimage is not mandatory in Christianity. According to her, Jesus Christ did not recommend pilgrimage for Christians; instead he said the kingdom of God is within us and that our body is the temple of the Holy Spirit.

“This clearly shows that a Christian does not have to go on pilgrimage before he can have spiritual rejuvenation unless he wants to go on tourism. We do not have to go on a pilgrimage because the other religion goes on pilgrimage. I personally do not consider it a necessary part of my Christian experience unless I want to go on vacation and I want to visit some Christian tourist centers. I do not attach any spiritual attachment to it. What is recommended by the Bible is that we should be born again, be baptized by water and the Holy Spirit. Jesus also commanded us to love our neighbours as ourselves. If we do these, we would have done all that Jesus commanded while he was on earth and the world would be a better place to live. Do you know that some Nigerians abscond when they get to Israel? They use the opportunity for illegal immigration. That is very shameful,’’ she said.

In another chat with Pastor Emmanuel Onoja of Hope of Life Evangelical Church, Lagos, he said, “for a Christian to see the places where Jesus walked, talked and performed his miracles is an experience in spirituality and to behold the beautiful ancient churches, the garden of Gethsemane, the pool of Siloam, (Pilate's Court), the empty tomb of Jesus is a deepening of one’s faith in God”.

He added: “Many Christians have come back with numerous testimonies when they visit the holy land. It is something that we Christians should encourage. I believe that it is something that will increase someone’s faith in God. We read all these places in the Bible; a pilgrimage will enable Christians to see them face to face, that to me is more than just tourism, it is spiritually uplifting’’.

According to him, though the Bible does not instruct Christians to go on holy pilgrimage to anywhere, he said he is convinced that pilgrimage to Jerusalem and other places mentioned in the Bible would be a humbling spiritual experience. 

However, Executive Secretary of the Nigerian Pilgrims Commission, John Kennedy Opara disagrees with those criticizing pilgrimage to Israel by Christians.

He said: ‘‘Contrary to the misconception in some quarters that pilgrimage is not commanded by the scriptures, it is a serious spiritual business which is clearly spelt out in Psalm 122 verse 6 “that those who love Israel, I will secure.

“Also in Zechariah 8 verse 22, ‘many people and powerful nations will come to Jerusalem to worship the Lord Almighty, and pray for his blessing. Others could be found in Zechariah 14: 16 -17.

“This is why on our own part, at NCPC and indeed the states’ Christian Pilgrim Welfare Boards, we are driving pilgrimage as a tool for moral transformation and spiritual rebirth. Pilgrimage is not the same as tourism in several ways. It is a spiritual journey to which the pilgrim tends to benefit tremendously. It is a journey to holy, sacred places to usher the pilgrims into the presence of God. Pilgrims embark on this journey with joyful hearts in anticipation and expectation of encountering God and are transformed, renewed and restored”.

Speaking further, Opara said ‘‘No fewer than 30,000 Nigerians perform Christian pilgrimage to Israel annually. “Pilgrimage is a tool for moral and spiritual upliftment and not a jamboree.It is a journey to the very source of Christianity, to the very place where "the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us. Visiting this pre-eminent spiritual destination is truly an experience of a lifetime and something not to be missed”.

Speaking further, the NCPC boss said: “We have widened the scope of the pilgrimage. Before now, our national pilgrimage ends only in Israel and Sinai but we have extended it to Rome, Greece, Corinth, Thessalonica and the Philippi and other places where Apostle Paul worked. If you are going on pilgrimage, you must have prepared your mind spiritually. If you prepare your mind spiritually, then you would be able to appreciate the visit and profit from it. The whole essence is to make people to be spiritually and morally transformed. When they come back, they will help the system and help the government to move forward. The Bible says faith cometh by hearing the word. When Christians go on pilgrimage, they do not hear alone, they see that which is preached physically and the effects is always awesome. They come back renewed. While in Israel, they see things the way it truly is that Jesus worked there; there is no fortress, and there are no hectare of land that they say belonged to Jesus and the message is clear to the people. Christ did everything without attributing or acquiring any wealth for himself, so it helps a lot.

“I want more than one hundred thousand Nigerians to go to Israel annually that is my dream; that more people should go to Israel annually. If I am able to get hundreds of thousands of Nigerians to go to Israel, every one of them will be able to affect lives. So, the multiplier effect will be much and over millions of lives will be transformed and we will live in peace and harmony. Pilgrimage is a tool for spiritual transformation. Pilgrimage is an act ordained by God almighty in the Bible.’’

In a testimony from the Nigerian Christian Pilgrimage Commission, NCPC, a woman pilgrim, name withheld, narrated her experience.

“I waited for the fruit of the womb for 18 years after marriage. There was no name people did not call me, even my in-laws did not spare me. Somebody told me about going on pilgrimage to seek the face of God. After much persuasion, I conceded to it. We travelled in 2009 to the State of Israel. At every site, I made it a point of duty to pray and when we got to the Wailing Wall (Solomon's Temple) in Jerusalem, I wrote out my prayer request, inserted it in the wall. Two months into our arrival in Nigeria, to the glory of God Almighty, I got pregnant and thereafter delivered a bouncing baby boy. After the arrival of my baby, the devil struck again, the baby was not crawling, talk-less of walking. After one year, I went back to the Wailing Wall to remind God of His promises. All glory to God, my son is not only walking but can talk fluently.’’

Attesting to its powerful impact on the visitor; William Johnston, author of a handbook on the Holy Land, says: "Here, the pilgrim who is open to God's grace will be deeply enriched in the Faith, for the mind will be filled with the awesome wonder of so many sacred shrines and this will be cemented in the heart never to fade". 

According to Pope Francis of the Catholic Church, a pilgrimage to the Holy land should be a time of prayer and close relationship with God.

Holy Communion: The divergent views

YEMI OLAKITAN

The Holy Communion or the Lord’s Supper has been considered to be one of the most important tenets of the Christian faith. The Lord Jesus commanded his followers to do it in remembrance of him. However, different denominations have different views concerning the Lord’s Supper, when and how it should be observed and who should observed it. Senior Correspondent, Yemi Olakitan, examines the differences with biblical texts.

According to the encyclopedia Britannica, the Last Supper, also called Lord’s Supper,  in the New Testament (Matthew 26:17–29; Mark 14:12–25; Luke 22:7–38; I Corinthians 11:23–25), was the final meal shared by the Lord Jesus to his disciples in an upper room in Jerusalem. According to the biblical account, Jesus sent two of his disciples to prepare for the meal and he met with all the disciples in the upper room. He told them that one of them would betray him. After blessing bread and wine and giving it to them to eat and drink, Jesus told them that it was his body and he commanded that it should be done in remembrance of him. This commandment has been kept and followed by Christians all over the world.  

According to the Scriptures, Jesus did not specifically state how often it should be observed. He simply said: “Keep doing this in remembrance of me.” (Luke 22:19) Apostle Paul however said: “For as often as you eat this loaf and drink this cup, you keep proclaiming the death of the Lord, until he arrives.” (1 Cor. 11:26) In a chat with Pastor Emmanuel Onoja of Hope of Life Evangelical church, he said, ‘‘the Last Supper or the Lords supper can be done as often as the believers decides and as the holy spirit directs, ‘it can be observed once in a year, it can be twice a year, weekly or monthly. It does not really matter because our Lord Jesus did not say specifically. The scripture says as often, which could be interpreted in many ways by different denominations. The most important thing is that Christians should obey the instruction of the Lord and observe the Lord’s Supper. It is also important to note that only those who have given their lives to the Lord Jesus and become born again children of God may observe the Lords supper because the Bible says we should not eat it unworthily. It is also not a festival meal where one eats and drinks to stupor; it is a very spiritual and symbolic exercise that should be taken with all sobriety and seriousness.’’

However a member of the Jehovah’s Witness, (name with held) insisted that the Lords supper should be observed annually. He said “as often” does not necessarily mean many times a year; it could mean yearly. Jesus said, ‘in remembrance of me.’ A remembrance should be an anniversary.  If you want to commemorate an important event, such as a wedding anniversary, or if a nation commemorates her independence anniversary, how often would that be? It would be once a year.  Speaking further, he said.  ‘‘Jehovah’s Witnesses observe the Memorial annually after sundown on Nisan 14, according to the reckoning of the Jewish calendar. Jesus died on the same Jewish calendar day that he instituted the Memorial.  Who partook when Jesus instituted the Lord’s Evening Meal shortly before he died? Eleven faithful followers to whom Jesus said: “I make a covenant with you, just as my Father has made a covenant with me, for a kingdom.” (Luke 22:29) They were all persons who were being invited to share with Christ in his heavenly Kingdom. (John 14:2, 3) All who partake of the bread and wine today should also be persons whom Christ brings into that ‘covenant for a kingdom.’   Jesus said that only a “little flock” would receive the heavenly Kingdom as their reward. (Luke 12:32) The full number would be 144,000. (Rev. 14:1-3)

In another chat with Deaconess Roseline Abimbola of the Global Church of the Living God, she said, since the Bible says it should be done often I believe that once in three months will be appropriate although in my church we do it monthly we observe it hymns. We do not sing praises. It’s a solemn mood.  In my church i expressed my views that once in three months is better but the elders chose monthly observance of the Holy Communion. It does not really matter when we observe it, as long as we observe the Communion.  What the Lord Jesus emphasized was the observance in remembrance of him. If he wanted it to be yearly or monthly he would have said so. He left that part for us to decide. I think that believers should submit themselves to the decision and authority of the leaders of the church. Once the church elders decide when to take it, we should submit to that authority and observe the Communion. Anyone who is born again and is a faithful follower of our Lord Jesus can observe the Holy Communion,’’ she said.

According to Pope John Paul II ‘‘Communion is an intimate encounter with Christ, in which we receive Christ into our bodies, that we may be more completely assimilated into him. It deepens unity with the Church, more fully assimilating us into Christ. It also strengthens the individual because in Jesus himself, the Word made flesh, forgives our sins and gives us the strength to resist mortal sin. It is the channel of eternal life.

 Jesus explained   the reasons for receiving Communion in the Gospel of John:  "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.  For, my flesh is real food, and my blood is real drink. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever" (John 6:53–58). 

In another chat with Elder Mrs. Victoria Osai of the Catholic Church, the Catholic Church encourages Catholics to receive frequent Communion, even daily Communion if possible.  ‘‘In other for one to receive the communion worthily, one must be in a state of grace without any mortal sin. One must also be baptized. "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup" (1 Cor. 11:27–28). 

In a statement by the Catholic Church, a mortal sin is any sin whose matter is grave and which has been committed willfully and with knowledge of its seriousness. Grave matter includes, but is not limited to, murder, receiving or participating in an abortion, homosexual acts, having sexual intercourse outside of marriage or in an invalid marriage, and deliberately engaging in impure thoughts (Matt. 5:28–29). (1 Cor. 6:9–10 and Gal. 5:19–21). 

In another chat with Kemi Adesina of the Living faith church, she said, ‘‘we take the Holy Communion in my church regularly, weekly. The communion is a remembrance of the Lord Jesus if possible I personally want to remember him daily. So, one can even take Communion daily.  We also take the communion singing praises. It is a joyful atmosphere because the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus brought salvation to mankind. We observe the Communion in a mood of celebration and thanksgiving.  However, only those who have giving their lives to Christ and repented of their sins, have embraced the new life in Christ Jesus can approach the communion table. If one has not given his life to Christ and become born again, then the person will be taking the Communion unworthily and we do not encourage that. The Communion is a very important part of the Christian faith because the Lord Jesus expressly commanded Christians to do it in remembrance of him. We have to do it.’’

According to the Bishop of the Living faith Church, David Oeydepo, one of the benefits of taking the communion regularly is the gifts of divine health which is given by God. ‘‘You cannot eat the body of the Lord Jesus and abhor sickness and disease in your body, it gives divine life to your body, spirit and soul’’ he said. 

Is the cross still a significant in Christendom?

Is the cross still a significant in Christendom?

YEMI OLAKITAN

The cross, which is considered to be the major symbol of Christendom, is gradually fading away in many churches today, although the Catholic Church and other orthodox churches have continued to use the cross as symbol in Christian worship. Senior Correspondent, Yemi Olakitan examines the subject.

1.      The encyclopedia Britannica in discussing the importance of the cross as a symbol of the Christian faith says, ‘‘it is the principal symbol of the Christian religion, recalling the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ and the redeeming benefits of his passion and death. The cross is thus a sign both of Christ himself and of the faith of Christians. In ceremonial usage, making a sign of the cross may be, according to the context, an act of profession of faith, a prayer, a dedication, or a benediction.’’

Sandra Akuoma a motivational speaker, Life Coach and CEO, Life Pointers and a member of the Catholic Church said, ‘‘the cross is still relevant today in Christianity because it represents the sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ on the cross although some people condemn the use of the cross I don’t do this. It is not right because I personally do not believe that one should condemn anybody’s belief because religion is a personal choice. I believe that one should respect other people’s religion and learn from it and add to your own from it, if what you see from that person’s religion is beneficial. Those whose belief attaches so much importance to the cross should not be criticized because everyone’s way of reaching God is personal and unique.’’

On whether, she would use the cross in worship or wear it as a form of jewelry, she said, ‘‘it is not the cross that matters it is my heart, one can wear the cross for everyone to see and the heart is polluted so the focus should not be the wearing of the cross but the heart of men. The inner garment is far more important than the outer garment. People should wear the cross in their heart more than they do the symbol.’’

However, in a chat with a member of the Jehovah’s Witness who declined to state his name saying we do not take credit for anything done for God, he said, ‘‘Jesus Christ did not die on a cross. Bible writers use another word for the instrument of Jesus’ death. It is the Greek word xy′lon. (Acts 5:30; 10:39; 13:29;Galatians 3:13; 1 Peter 2:24) This word means “timber” or “a stick, club, or tree. The Apostle Paul says: “Christ by purchase released us from the curse of the Law by becoming a curse instead of us, because it is written: ‘Accursed is every man hanged upon a stake’’ (Galatians 3:13) Here Paul quotes Deuteronomy 21:22, 23, which clearly refers to a stake, not a cross. Since such a means of execution made the person “a curse,” it would not be right for Christians to decorate their homes with the cross.’’

  In another statement, the Jehovah’s Witness says, ‘’There is no evidence that for the first 300 years after Christ’s death, that Christians used the cross in worship. In the fourth century, however, pagan Emperor Constantine became a convert to of Christianity and promoted the cross as its symbol. Whatever Constantine’s motives, the cross had nothing to do with Jesus Christ. The cross is, in fact, pagan in origin. The New Catholic Encyclopedia admits: “The cross is found in both pre-Christian and non-Christian cultures.” Other authorities have linked the cross with nature worship and pagan sex rites.’’

Reverend Andrew Akinsuyi said, ‘‘wearing the cross or making the sign of the cross is a symbol of the Christian faith. Christ indeed died on a cross. It was the practice in those days to crucify condemned criminals and since Christ was condemned by the Jews at the time, he was crucified on the cross. You cannot crucify someone without a cross. The cross is identified with the practice of crucifixion. When people wear the cross as part of jewelry, make the sign of the cross or use it to decorate their home, it is a sign that as Christians, we depend on God for everything that we do. The cross is a sign of Christ crucifixion and the death of Jesus Christ herald a new era for Christians because it was the death of Christ that brought about the salvation of humanity. The cross is not a thing of shame or a curse. It was the death of Jesus Christ that brought the hope of everlasting life to those who believe in the Lord Jesus. Therefore wearing the cross, using it in ceremonial worship is in harmony with scriptures.’’

Julius Badare, a member of the Catholic Church said, ‘‘the cross is a powerful Christian symbol and it is not limited to Catholics. It represents the cross upon which Christ died. The cross is present all around the church's interior in our church on the altar cloth, in the Stations of the Cross, and even on the priest's vestments. The Crucifix differs from the cross, in that it depicts the image of Christ being crucified, rather than that of the empty cross. The addition of His figure to the empty cross is intended to emphasize His human nature, which enabled him to suffer physical pain and death.  Not all crucifixes are identical. Depending on the mission of the church, the depiction of Jesus may evoke various emotions ranging from sorrow, to fear, or to awe. However, the purpose of the crucifix remains the same: to remind Catholics of the price Christ paid for humanity's redemption or salvation.’’

Elder Theophilus Ajibola of the United African Church opined that ‘‘the cross is a symbol of Christianity and has been traditionally recognized as such for hundreds of years. Those claiming that the cross is no longer relevant are deceiving themselves. The cross is still relevant. We still use the church in our church although the Pentecostals do not emphasize its importance but most of them agree that Christ was crucified on the cross and took our sins away through his death. This is the basis of Christianity.’’

Bishop of Kogi Diocese, the Right Reverend, A.I. Dawodu Adekunle Ilesanmi of the African Church Cathedral said, ‘‘Christians make an issue of what they should not make an issue of. The issue of Cross is an established doctrine of the Christian faith. Christ died on the cross and so the cross is a symbol of redemption, besides, symbol or no symbol, the reason why Christ died is far more important. It is because the word of God said that all have sinned and come short of the glory of God and His blood was atonement for sin. This is what is important and should transcend every argument. Look at the church in Aso Rock for example, when they were building it some denominations still made an issue of whether there should a cross there or not. I don’t think that Christians should make an issue of simple tenets of the faith. If a Christian uses the cross, it does not make him less a Christian, if he uses it and it enhances his faith in God why should we condemn it?  In the African church we use the cross regularly in our Sunday worship.’’

In another chat with pastor Emmanuel Onoja of Hope of Life evangelical Church, he said, ‘we do not emphasize the cross as a symbol but we emphasize its scriptural importance not as something physical that one can hold or touch. Salvation is the central gospel that we preach and we cannot talk about it without mentioning Christ’s death on the cross. It is important to preach salvation in that context because when Jesus was leaving the world, he gave a commandment to his followers which became the Great Commission today. He said we should go into the world and preach the Gospel, baptizing them in the name of the father and of the son and of the Holy Spirit. We also emphasize the born again experience because Christ said except a man be born again; he cannot enter the kingdom of God. Another concept, we emphasize immensely in Pentecostal circles is Christ commandment, which he gave to mankind that we should love one another even as he had loved us. He also said we should love our neighbor as ourselves. All these are highly important in Christianity and they are the central messages of Christ. As Christians, once we do these things, we have fulfilled the wishes of the Lord Jesus and these are far more important issues. The cross as a symbol of Christianity is possibly used to enhance the faith of the believers. We do not condemned nor propagate this as much as the orthodox churches do.’’ 

Should women be Pastors, Bishops and Overseers?

Should women be Pastors, Bishops and Overseers?

YEMI OLAKITAN 

 

The debate, whether a woman should be a pastors, overseers or Bishop in the church is a raging controversy.  In the orthodox churches women do not play such roles; however, modern Pentecostal churches have ordained women as Pastors and even Bishops. Senior Correspondent, Yemi Olakitan examines the issue with biblical texts and Christian views.

The issue of women leadership in the church is a subject of deep controversy since many women have exhibited great leadership talents in a way that is sometimes better than men. While some theologians feel that a woman can exercise authority in the office of pastors, deacons, overseers or Bishops, some have rejected the idea completely saying it goes against biblical instructions. 

In a chat with Pastor Emmanuel Onoja of Hope of Life Evangelical Church, a Pentecostal church, he said, ‘‘women can be ordained as pastors, deacons and even Bishops in the church. The Bible says we are all equal before God, "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus." (Gal. 3:28).  When Apostle Paul made the statement that women should keep quiet and should not be given leadership positions in the church, he was referring to the situation at that time. This cannot apply to modern day Christianity. Take the issue of spiritual gifts in the bible, it does not discriminate. Spiritual gifts are given to anyone, whether they are male or female. How then can we say women should not hold position of leadership in the church and should not teach? What happens if a woman has the gift of teaching?  If God gives a woman a ministry that requires her to exercise authority over men, then she should function in that office. If God gives a woman a ministry or a calling to be a pastor or a leader in the church and she does not officiate in that office, God will ask that woman. He will hold the woman accountable.  This does not mean that a woman should not be submissive to her husband at home,’’ he said.

Speaking further, Onoja said, ‘‘women should not abandon their marital obligations because of spiritual responsibilities in the church. They must know how to manage both effectively.   There is nothing wrong with women holding a position of authority in the Church of God. If God gives the woman the grace who are we to discourage them? When it comes to the family, it must be man; the head of the woman is the man. The place of ministry is different, if God uses a woman in church ministry, you cannot ask God why he is choosing a woman. There have been many instances where women have exhibited outstanding leadership in the church of God and contributed to the advancement of the Gospel, should we discourage them?  We would be denying the body of Christ an invaluable contribution to progress. The Holy Spirit does not look at gender. In the Bible, Esther was a leader, Deborah was a leader, once leadership is from God, whether it is a woman or man, we should respond. If we have respect for God, we should respect whoever, he puts in a leadership position whether in the church or outside the church,’’ he said.

In another chat with Superior Senior leader Samuel Gusinu of the Celestial Church of Christ, Ileri Ayo Parish, Lekki, he said, ‘‘women cannot hold position of authority over men in the celestial church of Christ.  This is because the Bible says, it is not right. If a woman is blessed and sets up a church, she must look for qualified men to act as overseers or shepherds in the house of God. She herself cannot do it. Women cannot preach or stand on the pulpit in the Celestial Church of Christ. They can be prophets. The gift of prophesying is giving to both men and women. Women can be prophets but they are excluded from the altar. They cannot stand on the pulpit to teach. The ultimate position, a woman can hold in the celestial church of Christ is ‘Mother in celestial.’ A ‘Mother in celestial’ is like a mentor to young women in the church. They do not exercise authority over men. Women cannot even make announcements in the celestial church let alone preach. We adhere strictly to what the Bible says on that issue because it is the word of God. The Apostle said, women should keep quiet in the church and be submissive to the authority of men, that’s it.  Jesus said, in the last days, there would be many false prophets. If one is truly a man of God, then one will speak according to the Bible. The Bible is God’s word. The Bible is very clear concerning the issue of women leadership in the church. They are not to take positions of leadership or authority in the church of God.

 In another chat with a member of the Jehovah’s witnesses, name withheld, he opined that, the Bible is the final authority on all issues for Christians. He then quotes 1 Timothy 2:11-12

‘‘But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but remain quiet.  For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.  And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression." (1 Tim. 2:12-14)

According to him, this bible verse only allows men to be pastors, elders and bishops in the church. Churches today have adopted the political and social standard that allows women to be pastors and elders in the church. Paul refers to the order of creation in his epistle to Timothy when he discusses the relationship between men and women in the church context.   ‘‘But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but remain quiet.  For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve. The woman is not to have authority over the man in the church context, but this does not extend to the political/economic world.  In the Old Testament Deborah was a judge in Israel over men, There is no doubt that women supported Paul in many areas and were great helpers in the church (Acts 2:17; 18:24-26; 21:8-9). What Paul is speaking of in 1 Tim. 2 is the relationship between men and women in the church structure. Even on the ministry of our Lord Jesus, all his disciples were men, does it mean there were no women who were qualified to be his disciples?’’  It goes against biblical instructions to ordain women as pastors particularly when they are to exercise authority over men in the church.’’

Elder Theophilus Ajibola of the United African Methodist Church said, the bishop/overseer is to be the husband of one wife (1 Tim. 3:2), who manages his household well, and has a good reputation (1 Tim. 3:4-5, 7). Deacons must be "men of dignity" (1 Tim. 3:8).  Paul then speaks of women in verse 11 and their obligation to receive instructions.  Then in verse 12, Paul says "Let deacons be husbands of one wife . . . “Again, in Titus 1:5-7, Paul says, "For this reason I left you in Crete, that you might set in order what remains, and appoint elders in every city as I directed you, namely, if any man be above reproach, the husband of one wife, having children who believe, not accused of dissipation or rebellion.   He is the husband of one wife, responsible, able to "exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict" (Titus 1:9).  We see no command for the overseers to be women.  On the contrary, women are told to be "dignified, not malicious gossips, but temperate, faithful in all things" (1 Tim. 3:11).   Why is it that it is the men who are singled out as the overseers?  It is because of the created order of God that Paul said this, (Gen. 1-2; 1 Tim. 2:12-14).  

He added that, ‘‘in the Old Testament in over 700 mentions of priests, every single one was a male.  There is not one instance of a female priest.  This is significant because priests were ordained by God to hold a very important office of ministering the sacrifices.  This was not the job of women. Therefore, Genesis 1-2, 1 Timothy 2, and Titus 1, the normal and proper person to hold the office of elder/pastor is to be a man.’’

Elder Theophilus said, ‘‘the verse that talked about male and female equality was not talking about church structure.  It is talking about salvation "in Christ."  It cannot be used to support women as pastors because that is not what it is talking about. To find out about church leadership, you need to go to those passages that talk about it: 1 Timothy 2 and Titus 1. God is a God of order.  He has established order within the family (Gen. 3:16; 1 Cor. 11:3; Eph. 5:22-33; Col. 3:18-21 ) and the church (1 Tim. 2:11-14; 1 Cor. 11:8-9).  Even within the Trinity, there is an order--a hierarchy.  The Father sent the Son (John 6:38), and both the Father and the Son sent the Holy Spirit (John 14:26; 15:26).  Jesus said, "For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of Him who sent me." (John 6:38).  In creation, God made Adam first and then Eve to be his helper.  This is the order of creation.  It is this order that Paul mentions in 1 Tim. 2:11-14 when speaking of authority.  Being a pastor or an elder is to be in the place of authority. Therefore, within the church, for a woman to be a pastor or elder, she would be in authority over men in the church which contradicts what Paul says in 1 Tim. 2:11-14.  Not having a place of leadership in the church does not mean a woman is less of a person, less important to God, or inferior.  All are equal before God whether it is a Jew, Gentile, free, slave, male, or female. In the church, God has set up an order the same way he set one up in the family. The chain of command is Jesus, the man, the wife, and the children.  God's word clearly tells us that the elder is to be the husband of one wife.   A woman cannot qualify for this position by virtue of her being female,’’ he said.