Monday, 15 December 2014

Driver’s license: The palaver

YEMI OLAKITAN

An investigative media chat with an average Nigerian driver on his experience with driving in Nigeria, particularly the commercial capital Lagos, will reveal an endless tales of woes such as ‘‘LASMA harassment,’’ police extortions, confrontations with hoodlums, traffic jams, road safety officials, bad roads and many more. Chief of these is the problem of procurement and renewal of driver’s license which was described by a particular driver as ‘‘complete madness.’’ Discussions with various drivers by Sunday Mirror reveal that many are not too happy with the system put in place by the authorities to procure or renew their driver’s license. Ag. Head of investigations, Yemi Olakitan examines the subject.

A driver's license or driving license is an official document that states that a person can drive an automobile without supervision. The laws relating to the licensing of drivers vary between one country and the other. In some countries a license is issued after one has passed a test while in others; a person acquires a license before beginning to drive and may not need to pass through a driving school.  According to Barrister Shittu, a Lagos based lawyer, the authorities have made the new driving license regime cumbersome with too many procedures, they need to simplify the process and make it easier. ‘‘It is the same thing with registering a business, getting an international passport; we like to make things complicated in Nigeria, thereby creating an opportunity for crooks, thieves and counterfeiters to thrive. If things are simple to obtain, then there would be no need for a black market for fakes who peddle their products as genuine,’’ he said.
soyinka
In a chat with Seyi Imohi, a taxi driver based in Lagos Island on his experience, he said, ‘‘the government should return driving license procurement and renewal to the local government as we used to do it before. Look at the hassles we go through just to collect a driver’s license. It does not worth it at all.  You collect form, you go to the bank to pay, and then you go to VIO, someone that has been driving for the past 20 years, They are asking the person to go to a driving school, after going through so many procedures, you are then asked to wait for months. This is madness! They should hand it over; people should go to their respective local governments and collect the drivers’ licenses, you want to collect drivers’ license, for six months, you are still on it. They should change the system. It was not like this before. I got my drivers’ license in 1981. It is here with me and it is still intact. This country belongs to all of us. They should put up a system that makes things convenient and not frustrating. They are treating us like second class citizens in our own country,’’ he said. 
Babangida

In another chat with James Xavier, an IT professional, on his experience on the procurement of a drivers’ license, he said, ‘‘when you get to their office and you queue up and spend the whole day to procure the drivers’ license. They will then announce to you that the original license cannot be ready as at yet. You would have to do with a temporary driving license. In which case, you have no choice but to collect it and leave since they are the one body responsible for it. Then after a few weeks or months depending on how lucky or unlucky you are, the original will still not be out. I have been using a temporary driving license for the past one year and a half and there is no hope of a permanent driver’s license in sight,’’ he said.
Speaking further, James said, ‘after using the temporary driving license for weeks or even months, you then get pulled over by FRSC officials while driving and they will look at your temporary driving license that you suffered so much to collect in their office. They will then tell you that your license is fake. How can it be fake when you were the ones who gave it to me in your office? You took my data capture with all the delaying and suffering. You now tell me it’s fake; it means that FRSC is giving out fake driver’s licenses,’’ he said. 
In another chat with Yusuf Lawal, a commercial driver, he said, ‘‘I got a temporary drivers’ license since April, this year. They said they will call me for capturing. Up until now they have not call me. I have gone to their office here at Sura, many times. They will just sign here and there. They will say, it is not ready and I have been using the temporary license like that. I have been traveling with it and my car is good although, they have not harassed me on the road but I feel it is taking too long. On what the government should do to arrest the situation, he said, ‘‘I heard a rumour that they will soon make it a local government by local government thing. I heard that soon it will only take three or four days to procure your drivers’ license, I pray that will come true and that it happens as they say because we can no longer continue with this new arrangement. It is not working,’’ he said. 


In another chat with a commercial driver, Bioye Oyeniyi, he said, I got my driver’s license in Ibadan, Oyo state. I tried to get it in Lagos state but the hassles were too much so I went back to my state to collect it. They were asking me to pay N25, 000 to get a drivers’ license so I said instead of me to pay that kind of money I will go to my state ad get it and I got it. In fact, drivers are facing a lot of problems in Lagos; driver’s license is just one. What about LASMA? They harass us with the most flimsy excuses and treat us like dung,’’ he said.
Another driver, Mr. Balogun Ayinde, he said, ‘‘I know someone, a friend of mine who has been carrying a temporary driver’s license for the past seven months and when you are driving you ought to carry your driver’s license. What is the use of a professional driver without a license? We are treated anyhow by transport law enforcement agents, all because we do not have somebody at the top. This driver’s license issue has been politicized and monetized. This is why we are facing all these problems in obtaining it. Otherwise, why is there so many problems attached to it? Is this the first time the Federal government has been giving Driver’s license to Nigerians?’’ he said.

Speaking with Mr., Anthony Giobagunwo, he said, ‘‘we want the federal government to help us concerning the problem of Driver’s license. It should not take more than two days to collect your driver’s license. It is not necessary to go to driving school. There are hundreds of Nigerians who have been driving for the past ten years and never went to a driving school. All that should be required is a test result and it should not take more than three days. If you go to these people’s office, they will give you one sheet of paper for one year.  As I am speaking to you, my driver’s license is expired but I have not collected another one because of the hassles. The government should make it easy for us to collect it; you will use one year to fill a form and another year to do capturing and another year to collect it. They need to employ more people to do the job simplify things, so that it will be easier,’’ he said.

Investigations by Sunday Mirror reveals that there are also some private agencies or driving schools who give out driving licenses to drivers in Lagos. In a chat with an official of one of the agencies who spoke on anonymity, she said, ‘All that you need to do is to obtain a form for N5, 000, submit your passport photographs and test results and then after a few days, your driver’s license is ready for collection. She insisted on the genuineness of her company’s driver’s license. ‘Our driver’s license is not fake. It is genuine. We don’t obtain in Lagos. They are from Ogun state. I can assure you it is genuine,’’ she said.

Investigations reveal that some government officials do take advantage of the cumbersome process of obtaining driver’s license to make a business for themselves by giving out driver’s licenses for a fee.
There are many fake driver’s license in the hands of drivers these days that you wonder whether, there is an original one,’’ said Ibrahim, a taxi driver. ‘‘It is all the fault of the Federal Road Safety Corps and other agencies responsible for issuing driver’s license. They should just make the process simple. If you look at the hassles, the waiting, and the queuing up at the FRSC office and then you meet someone who says, I will get you a license within 3 days, you will want to go for it and then when you look at the counterfeit driver’s license. It looks like the original.’’
 According to FRSC the government launched a new driver’s license issuing system that changed the requirements and procedures to obtain a driver’s license in 31 Jan. 2012. This chaotic situation actually started in 2013, when the government gave an October deadline to phase out the old drivers license and plate number for vehicles. All agencies of government particularly in Lagos State found it lucrative to pounce on vehicles on the road and challenge owners or drivers of such cars to produce their driver’s licenses.  The Vehicle Inspection Officers, VIO, and Nigeria Police especially have in such circumstance declared as “fake” even the drivers licenses issued by FRSC causing their victims to part with some money.

It is widely believed that the officers of the authorities involved in the issuing process are taking advantage of the scheme to enrich themselves.  Applicants attributed the compromise to demand for gratification and inhuman treatment, especially during the data-capturing stage. The process has rapidly created a business, informally, for the operatives of the agencies that play one role or the other during the stage of documenting applicants, or in the process of capturing their biometric data.
According reports, it is just like a racket from which some FRSC personnel and VIOs are feeding fat. On-duty officers reportedly demand for a minimum of N2, 000 to enable them collate applicants’ forms and where you fail to meet their demands, you will not be able to go through the process in record time. These are some the reasons why Nigerians experienced delay in obtaining their driver’s license.
The FRSC attributed the reasons for the delay to problems with the FRSC's technical partners during the upgrade to the new system.  In July 2011, a Nigerian national newspaper, not Mirror, reported the Deputy Director of Operations at the Vehicle Inspection Office as conceding that “'driver’s licensing is in a bit of disarray at this point. ‘‘If you go to most states of the federation, you will find that they are not able to produce driver licenses because of the current confusion” and indicated that the different agencies involved in issuing driver's licenses (i.e., the FRSC, the Board of Internal Revenue and the Vehicle Inspection Office) are using different procedures.  Sources report that citizens with the former version of the driver's license will be required to upgrade to the new one regardless of whether their current license has expired or not.
However, the situation in other states of the country is not as pathetic as that of Lagos state. Reports say that Ogun state’s system is faster and more organized.  An applicant completes an application form that he or she also dates and signs. The applicant provides a signature on a signature mandatory card, which is then scanned into a database and displayed on the driver's license. The applicant also provides two passport photographs that will also be scanned into the database and displayed on the driver's license. He pays "the cashing office" a processing fee in cash or by a bank draft.  In addition to the application form and fee, he also provides proof of his identity or name by producing an international passport, or a birth certificate or sworn declaration of age or affidavit. The declaration of age or affidavit must be sworn before a court by a family member. He provides a written driving test and proof that he or she has passed a road test from an "approved instructor or driving school". A licensing officer verifies the results before the applicant submits a copy to the licensing office. Once the application has been processed and the documents verified, the driver's license is mailed to the applicant's "residential or chosen mailing address."
Investigation reveal that even in Ogun state, the applicants "can not obtain an on the spot drivers license because the application must be processed". This includes updating the database and allocating a number to the application. The driver's license number identifies the applicant and cannot be changed. An applicant can obtain a license from a state in which he is not a resident. Sometimes applicants will receive a driver's license from a different state than the one from which they applied because of the high volume of applications in the first state.
The idea of an autonomous body regulating traffic, in addition to the Nigeria Police, who are statutorily charged with that responsibility, started from Oyo State, under the government of Chief Bola Ige, who as governor of Oyo State, was tired of the carnage on the old Ibadan-Ife highway. The road ranked first among slaughter houses, called trunk roads in those days; surpassing the Lagos-Ibadan; Kano-Zaria-Kaduna; Onitsha-Owerri-Aba and the Warri-Patani-Portharcourt roadways which were its closest rivals.  The governor thought if the idea was not to degenerate into another opportunity for bribery, it required somebody with integrity. Professor Wole Soyinka was his choice. The Nobel Prize Winner lived up to his expectations as he was frequently on the roads himself, assisting in making the arrests.

Destruction of lives and properties abated very quickly – not only on Ibadan-Ife, but Ibadan-Iwo and Ibadan-Oyo roads.  The change of governors in Oyo State in 1983 and the military coup of December 31, 1983 brought an end to corps activities in Oyo State. When General Ibrahim Babangida came to power in 1985, he provided the opportunity for the nation to revisit the issue of a road safety unit autonomous of the police, who were considered corrupt.  In 1988, by Decree 59, the Federal Road Safety Corps was promulgated into law and Professor Wole Soyinka became the Corps Marshal.  However, according to James Xavier, it can hardly be said that the FRSC is still the same organization that Professor Wole Soyinka left behind since they seemed to have danced to the tune of corruption since Professor Soyinka left. 

The Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC), was mandated by law to take charge of matters of road safety and regulations. However this role has been challenged in court by Nigerians.  it has been argued that, ‘‘the FRSC has no power to issue drivers' licenses, a function that critics say, constitutionally lies with the states, A coalition of civil society and non-governmental organizations also argued that the FRSC's practice of issuing driver's licenses is "an aberration of the 1999 Constitution."

Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court in Lagos on March 26 declared that the FRSC had no legal authority to impose new number plates or driving licenses on motorists in the country.  The judge also held that “the ongoing exercise by the FRSC to replace the old number plate with a new one is illegal and unconstitutional because there is no law empowering it to carry out the exercise.’’
Justice Tsoho delivered the judgment in a suit filed by a Lagos-based lawyer, Mr Emmanuel Ofoegbu, against the FRSC.  In the suit, Ofoegbu had challenged the power of the commission to impound vehicles of motorists who failed to acquire the new number plates. The plaintiff argued that there was no law validly made in accordance with the constitution prohibiting the use of the old number plates.

However, an Anambra State High Court sitting in Awka ruled that the issuance of new vehicle number plates and drivers licenses by the Federal Road Safety Commission, FRSC, is “legal” and “constitutional,” citing “Section 5 of the Act of 2007.    
In May, Adeniyi Ademola, the judge of a Federal High Court in Abuja, ruled that the FRSC lacked the constitutional power to compel vehicle owners to renew their vehicle particulars which had yet to expire and declared the threat of the commission to arrest and prosecute motorists who did not obtain the new license and number plates illegal and unconstitutional.
 “The court is also mindful of the recent judgment of a Lagos Federal High Court on the same subject matter, which I completely aligned with.”
In a judgement delivered on June 30, in a suit instituted by one Ajefo Ekwo, against the commission on the legality of the issuance of the new number plates and drivers licences, the trial judge, Peter Umeadi, who is also the Chief Judge of Anambra State, ruled that by the provision of the National Road Traffic Regulation 2012 and the Federal Road Safety Commission Act 2007, the FRSC is empowered to issue new vehicle number plates and drivers licenses.
“I hold that the directive of the respondent to all motorists previously registered to re-register their vehicles for the purpose of changing their old number plates with new vehicle number plates is legal and constitutional and stand firmly on both Act 2007 and Regulations of 2012,” the judge declared.
“Section 5 of the Act of 2007 allows the commission, the Respondent, to make regulations for carrying out the objectives of the Act. The Act of 2007 specifically allows the respondent to make regulation with regard to the designing and producing of drivers’ licenses, and vehicle number plates to be used by various categories of vehicles.”
The judge ruled that it is wrong to hold the FRSC responsible for the discontinuance of the old number plates explaining that by the passing of the National Road Traffic Regulation 2012; it is only natural for the old plates to be changed.
“As soon as the Regulations of 2012 were made, they took a life of their own. It does not matter if it was done by the respondent or that the respondent is vested with the powers. But it is not only the respondent that was vested with the powers therein. It just happened that the Regulation of 2012 and the Act of 2007 allow the respondent to place a pivotal role in the sequence event to realize the goal of the legislations. It is on this note that it should be understood that old vehicle registration license were not discontinued by the respondent qua respondent but by the force of the Regulation of 2012.
“I agree with the learned counsel of the respondent that to achieve the use of legal, legitimate and now only authorized new vehicle registration licences and driver licences the old ones have to be discontinued and the law has vested the respondent with the power to do that.”

According to reports, the Federal Road Safety Commission (FRSC) as a result of the judgment said it would begin enforcement of the new drivers’ licence and number plate is Aug 1, 2014.  The Lagos State Sector Commander, Mr Chidi Nkwonta, said that the decision followed the new court judgment.  “This new judgment made it very clear that as from Aug. 1, FRSC should impound. “So, Nigerians must discountenance that first misleading judgment and take this one because we are going to continue enforcement as from Aug. 1, 2014.’’
“We never asked anybody to stop (processing licences). Anybody who stopped ab initio stopped at his own peril. “Neither did the court ask anybody to stop, that judgment never said anybody should stop. “So anybody who did so did it at his own risk and the deadline was supposed to be June 30.
“Now we have extended it to Aug. 1, because we needed to go on appeal on the other matter.  “But right now, there is another judgment which says we can go on.
“So, while we are still waiting for the appeal we are going to go on with this other judgment.“
This was FRSC response to Justice Peter Umeadi of a Federal High Court in Anambra on June 30 which had ruled in a suit filed by Chief Ajefo Ekwo challenging FRSC’s powers to enforce new drivers’ licence and number plates.
Umeadi said that the respondent’s directive to change old drivers’ licence and number plates to new was legal, valid, subsisting and in conformity with the FRSC’s 2007 Act and the National Road Traffic Regulations of 2012.
Nkwonta, however, said that the recent judgment had put aside the earlier judgment of the Lagos High Court ruling that the corps had no authority to produce and fix deadline for the documents.  The FRSC commander said that the earlier judgment was given in error and the commission would stand by the new judgment while appealing against the earlier judgment.
He said that the command had not failed to process the vehicle documents for new applicants that patronized the commission after the initial judgment. Nkwonta said that all the registration centres and 18 additional work stations in all parts of Lagos were functional and the network was effective.  He said that the commission had improved in the processes as well as working at weekends to make it easy for applicants.

According to the FRSC in the new arrangement made public, to apply for a driver's license, applicants must be at least 18 years old.  Those who are renewing their drivers’ licenses are to apply online at www.nigeriadriverslicence.org or in person at a Driver's License Centre (DLC). Pay the licence fee online or at the Bank. Present your application form to the Board of Internal Revenue (BIR) Officer and Vehicle Inspection Officer (VIO) at the DLC for endorsement. Proceed to the Federal Road Safety Corps Officer at the DLC for biometric data capture. Obtain a temporary driver’s license valid for 60 days. Pick up original driver’s license at the BIR Office after 60 days.Soyinka
Applicants who are obtaining licenses for the first time are to attend training at an accredited driving school. The driving school will then present you to the Vehicle Inspection Officer (VIO) for a driving test. Pass the driving test and obtain a certificate of proficiency from the VIO. Complete the driver's license application form at the Driver's Licence Centre (DLC). Pay the license fee online or at the Bank.


Present your application form to the Board of Internal Revenue (BIR) Officer and VIO at the DLC for endorsement. Proceed to the FRSC Officer at the DLC for biometric data capture. Obtain a temporary driver’s licence valid for 60 days. Pick up original driver’s license at the BIR Office after 60 days.

Saturday, 13 December 2014

(SURE-P) is a mere political gimmick- Chief Bayo Ogunmupe

(SURE-P) is a mere political gimmick- Chief Bayo Ogunmupe


ogunmupe 


YEMI OLAKITAN
Bayode Ogunmupe is a veteran journalist, economist and literary critic. He was Educated at the University of Ibadan; University of Geneva and the London School of Economics, UK; he holds degrees in History, Economics and Business. Ogunmupe has been Political Editor, Daily Sketch; Production Editor, Nigerian Tribune; Senior Sub Editor, Daily Times; Associate Editor, Newswatch and Economic columnist and literary critic for The Guardian. He was a recipient of the Nigerian Media Merit Awards in 1993 and the Ladi Lawal Journalist of the Year Award in 2010. He is the author of the international bestseller, Nigerian Politics in the age of Yar’Adua. Ogunmupe dismissed SURE-P as mere political campaign tool. Excerpts:
·         What is your opinion about SURE-P? There are reports that people are benefiting from it.
It is a mere political design, a gimmick. It is not true that people are benefiting from it. I have a personal experience with SURE-P. I applied for business loan and I was not given. They didn’t give it to me for any justification. My business was properly registered.  
It was like a small business. They were supposed to fund it.  The conditions were you should have a registered company, a business plan; both of which I had and I was not given the funding. I also tried applied for one of my sister in law who was unemployed at the time. She is a university graduate and it was the same experience.
I thought that may be, it was because of the women, men women gender disparity but the woman was not given also. She has a good education. She studied Accountancy so she could do something.  Why did Christopher Kolade who was former chairman of this committee resigned. It was because nothing tangible was happening there that could reach ordinary Nigerians.  
·         It was just propaganda?
It is just a propaganda stunt. They created it to score political points.  It is purely a Political propaganda and even a way to embezzle money that is why Dr. Kolade resigned as chairman so there is nothing in it. If it is good project why did Kolade resigned.
·         As an economist, do you think it would work if it was properly implemented?
It is a good way to stop unemployment and poverty. It is a good way, if it is properly run. it is the kind plan that was implement in the United States in 1948 after the second world war which bought up the European nations back to normalcy.
 If It will be done but it is going to be done by an agency independent of government such as INEC,  devoid of bureaucracy that goes on in civil service oriented organization or a bank.
Yes actually you can, through the SURE-P, give loans to Nigerians through the banks. They can give loans, without interest, collateral free. You can give any Nigerian that is qualified to do business. This will encourage entrepreneurship truly help to eradicate poverty.
 It could work but the people are not sincere. They could have created a plan that can encourage entrepreneurship, but the Nigeria factor is always there.  People are not ready to work sincerely for the development of the nation. They are ready to work it. The belief is that, what is in it for me, what can I steal?
What about the issue that led to the creation of SURE- P?
What led to it was this man, the former Central Bank Governor, Lamido Sanusi exposed subsidy as farce.  He exposed subsidy as a farce and that People were using subsidy to steal money from the Federal Government.  They discovered he was right so the government wanted to compensate the people for removing the subsidy so they establish SURE-P to compensate the people.
Was the removal of subsidy actually justified?
Yes, it was, Yes for me, economically, subsidy is always corruption. It is a way to steal money. The World Bank is against subsidy of any form because it is always a way for government to steal money so the best thing Jonathan has ever done was to privatize electricity.
If President Goodluck Jonathan wants to do something for Nigerians, It will be to create  bank products backed up by SURE-P which allows people, Nigerians to obtain loans without collateral, loans without interests and without discrimination.
There should only be three factors to qualify a person for the loan; anyone who is 21 years of age, anyone who is a Nigerian citizen, and is properly registered, once those factors are available, the person should be able to access a loan.  
This is what President Goodluck Jonathan needs to do. Get a banking product available to all Nigerians who are passionate about business and entrepreneurship. This would be supervised by the central bank of Nigeria.
Let the Federal Republic of Nigeria ensure that anybody who is a Nigerian citizen has access to it. All these SURE- P is a complete waste of money. Some people just want to embezzle money.
it appears as a good plan but the Nigeria factor is always there. Give loans to Nigerians who wants to do business. You can give between 1million to ten million particularly import substitution enterprise.


Can u buttress that point?
Import substitution enterprises involve all things Nigerian imports. You can now tell those companies Nigeria import from to service two or three Nigerian companies and to help them to be able to produce those things in Nigeria.  In the next 10 years you can now make it a law, if a company is not doing that you blacklist it. Make credit facility available for all Nigerians who want to participate in such a venture within three years poverty will be gone in this country.  This is all they need to do. President Jonathan is thinking about second term no sincerity. He is just doing this project for the sake of second term ambition. He wants to bribe the people deceived them so that they can vote for him


How sure is Sure-P?


BY YEMI OLAKITAN 


In 2012, the Federal Government had explained that subsidy removal was necessary to end the vast corruption taking place under the subsidy regime, and promised to reinvest the saved money into infrastructure, health and education. The government had to introduce a partial subsidy as a result of widespread protests that took place against the subsidy removal, and set up a fund into which the saved money would be channeled. 

This fund was called, the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) it was charged with using the subsidy savings to invest in infrastructure and empowerment initiatives that benefit Nigerians.  With $2.5 billion having flowed into the project – and a further $1.6 billion in 2014 – what has SURE-P achieved so far? Ag. Head of Investigations, Yemi Olakitan takes a critical look at the programme, examining the controversies.


On Monday, 2 January 2012 in response to the removal of the subsidy on oil  by the Federal Government of President Jonathan on Sunday, 1 January 2012, widespread protests took place across the country. The protests was tagged Occupy Nigeria. 16 people were reportedly killed during the protests. The protest was characterized by demonstrations.
The country  is said to be the largest producer of crude oil in Africa, but still imports fuel despite producing about 2.4 million barrels of crude oil daily which is exported to be refined abroad and exported back into the country. American states person, Hilary Clinton, during a visit to Nigeria described the situation as ‘‘a clear case of mismanagement.’’

 Cheap petrol is regarded as the only benefit Nigerians receives from the state, hence the widespread disapproval. Governor of the CBN  Lamido Sanusi said the subsidy was unsustainable". The government explained that subsidy regime in which fixed prices are maintained irrespective of market realities has resulted in a huge unsustainable subsidy burden. Fuel subsidies do not reach the intended beneficiaries. Subsidy level is correlated with household income, as richer households consume larger quantities of the products.

According to the Federal Government at the time, subsidy administration is beset with inefficiencies, leakages and corruption. Subsidy has resulted in the diversion of scarce public resources away from investment in critical infrastructure, while putting pressure on government resources.  Subsidy has discouraged competition and stifled private investment in the downstream sector. Due to lack of deregulation, investors have shied away from investment in the development of refineries, petrochemicals, fertilizer plants, etc. Investigations reveal that since the year 2000, government has issued 20 licenses for new refineries, none of which has materialized into new refineries. The deregulation of the downstream sector of the petroleum industry, it was argued will lead to private sector investment in refineries and petrochemicals, which will generate millions of jobs and bring prosperity.
Huge price disparity has encouraged smuggling of petroleum products across the borders to neighboring countries, where prices are much higher. Nigeria therefore ends up subsidizing consumption of petroleum products in neighboring countries. Despite the explanations given, protesters refuse to cooperate with the government. Former President Olusegun Obasanjo had tried to remove the subsidy but have backed down because of protests and reduced it instead.
As part of palliatives aimed at cushioning the effects of the subsidy removal, the federal government had announced a ‘massive transportation scheme’ about 1600 diesel-powered mass transit vehicles, was promised to be distributed. In a similar vein, President Good luck Jonathan established the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme, SURE-P as a palliative measure. He inaugurated a committee to manage the Programme. The Committee had the following membership: Dr. Christopher Kolade, CON Chairman, Gen. Martin Luther Agwai (Rtd) - Deputy Chairman, Hon Minister of Finance/CME Member, Hon. Minister of Petroleum Resources Member,  Hon. Minister National Planning Member, Hon. Minister of State Health Member, Prof. Kunle Ade Wahab  and others. 
The president explained that The Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Program (SURE-P) is an intervention mechanism for the nation’s development.
 ‘‘I inaugurated the board of the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) under the leadership of Dr. Christopher Kolade. I also had the great privilege of kicking off the Public Works Women and Youth Empowerment Programme which is an intervention programme designed to employ 370,000 youths in the year 2012 with 30% of those jobs being reserved for women. This programme will also place young graduates as interns in firms and companies with a view to sharpening their skills preparatory to engaging in entrepreneurship and those firms that choose to retain these graduates will be given incentives by the Federal Government. This is only one step in government's plan to provide the enabling environment for all willing Nigerians to get to work and compliments the Youth Enterprise with Innovation in Nigeria (You Win) initiative which I launched on the 11th of October 2011.’’
According to the PDP led Jonathan’s Government, the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme was designed to mitigate the immediate impact of the partial petroleum subsidy removal on the population by laying a foundation for the successful development of a national safety net programme that targets the poor and vulnerable on a continuous basis.

Regrettably, SURE-P has been trailed by one controversy or the other. Chief of them was the N2.2billion SURE-P fund reportedly used for secretarial services and another N500 billion allegedly missing. According to the then Chairman, Christopher Kolade of the Sure-P committee who later resigned on the ground of old age, the media had promoted the inaccurate story that such an amount was missing from the fund. The former chairman said in an interview that it was all a widely celebrated rumour, he said,   ‘I have a grouse against the media. First of all, if you look at our accounts, our budget; you will find the amount earmarked for secretariat services, in order words, for running our offices and staff, etc nationwide for 2012. It was only N1billion, so if anybody is going to spend more than N1 billion on the secretariat, he has to go back to the National Assembly to get funds from other places to supplement the N1 billion. So, we did not have N2.2 billion. What has happened; we put down our reports to the National Assembly that so far, to that point, we had spent N220 million on secretariat services. Somebody in National Assembly read that to mean N2.2 billion. When we went to National Assembly and they said how come you spent N2.2 billion for secretariat services, I said where is that? And they said we should look at our account. We said, no, read it properly, it’s N220million. Members of the media were there. When the publications started, it was N2.2 billion they published. They did not attend to the correction that we made that it was N220 million. Until now, we are still talking about N2.2 billion. I don’t know what else my committee should do to correct this and therefore, I go back to what I said about the N500 billion allegedly missing. There are mischief makers here. There are people who are deliberately spreading wrong information because they want to create confusion.’’

Critics also accused the SURE-P of duplicating projects and defrauding the nation by making double payments for projects already embarked upon and financed by the various ministries and agencies. The National Assembly had also took a swipe at the  Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P), describing it as a drain pipe on the Nigerian economy, it called on the government to scrap it if there were no improvements. The Lawmakers who expressed their lack of confidence on the activities of SURE-P stressed that the agency was a duplication of activities already carried out by existing Ministries, Department and Agencies, MDAs in the country.

The former chairman Dr. Christopher Kolade, CON who later resigned, citing old age, had explained that the SURE-P’s funds are split between the Federal Government and States and Local Government, and are used in two ways: to help fund infrastructural development; and to support social security programmes related to issues such as women and youth empowerment, unemployment, and community service. He also said the programme was an intervention mechanism aimed at helping out on government’s abandoned projects or improving on them.

Investigations revealed that, when the National Assembly asked SURE-P in November 2012 to produce its 2012 budget expenditure analysis, lawmakers were dismayed to hear that lots of the things SURE-P committee members pointed to were projects already being carried out by the Federal Government. The SURE-P board claimed to have spent N16 billion ($100 million) on the Benin Ore Shagamu road – a project for which the Federal Government had already awarded a N65.2 billion ($400 million) contract in September 2012 – and said it had contributed N9.3 billion ($57 million) to the Lagos-to-Ibadan railway – a development for which a $1.4 billion contract was signed between the Federal Government and the China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) in August 2012.  Senator Danjuma Goje, a member of the Senate Committee on Petroleum said, “They are not initiating any new projects, they only put money into existing projects.”
Furthermore, reports reveal that SURE-P had come under heavy suspicion of succumbing to corruption. The Kaduna State House Assembly was reported to have ordered the suspension of SURE-P in the state and constituted a committee to investigate the implementation of SURE-P’s state projects and activities. Allegations of dubious transactions and misappropriation were leveled against the programme coordinators in the state with a reported N560 million ($3.1 million) missing from the Kaduna State SURE-P coffers. 

“My opinion is this, the SURE-P programme appeared well thought through,’’ said Ezekiel Keith, who described himself as a social critic, he said, ‘SURE- P is a well structured programme that can benefit Nigerians but like always we are plagued with the Nigeria factor. ‘‘All we have seen are fine buses in Abuja, the federal capital.’’  He said, ‘‘the committee needs to do more to improve the living conditions of Nigerians in the grassroots across the nation. Millions of young Nigerians are still unemployed.’’
Dr Christopher Kolade speaking on the activities of SURE-P said the programme has been misunderstood by most Nigerians. Dr. Christopher Kolade said it is an interventionist project.

‘‘I do not know why most people are misunderstanding the word ‘’intervention.’’ The normal programme of government will be going on. How did this intervention come about? The federal government decided to de-regulate the petroleum industry.  It is the oil subsidy that provides the fund with which SURE-P carries out its project. You know that government at the beginning wanted to withdraw the entire subsidy but when there were protests, government did a partial withdrawal, so that the petroleum we have been buying N65 per litre now became N97 per litre, there was an increase of N32. We will now use the money they withdraw on meaningful projects. Government has decided what to do with the money. The money that was now going to accrue will be shared to the states and local governments. For 2012, it was calculated to amount to N180b. The federal government defines the projects we embark upon. There is a document called the SURE-P programme which guides the projects we embark upon.  Most of these projects are in categories; components.’’ he said.

 Speaking further, he said, ‘‘I have seen a lot of media comments almost insinuating that we are doing wrong projects or that we don’t know what we are doing. No, it is not true, we are an intervention body, we can only intervene the way government said we should do. The state and the Local Governments of the Federation have their own SURE-P budget and they are in sole control of it. The beneficiaries on our scheme are private sector operators as we are Federal Government Scheme; hence we operate independently from state and local government,’’ he said.
Dr, Kolade explained the committee’s involvement in road contraction. According to him, this focuses on accelerating the completion of the long standing East – West Road by the Ministry of Niger Delta Affairs (MNDA). The 338km road connects the following towns in the Niger Delta, South-South Zone:  Effurun/Warri – Ughelli – Patani – Kaiama – Mbiama – Ahoada – Elele  – Emouha  –  Choba – Port Harcourt – Onne – Ogoni – Eket  – Oron and Calabar. The SURE-P funds is managed by The Infrastructure Bank (TIB), they are responsible for monitoring the loans and payment to suppliers and operators.  Sure-P intervention in the rail subsector i.e. for the three main projects, covers: The rehabilitation of the Western line (Jebba – Kano Line Rehabilitation Project); The rehabilitation of the Eastern Line (Port Harcourt – Maiduguri Rehabilitation Project); The Nigerian Railway Modernization Project (Abuja (Idu) – Kaduna, Addendum I, Segment I)). The Western line rehabilitation consists of two (2) contracts, namely:  Contract I – Lagos – Jebba, and Jebba – Kano.  The Eastern Line Rehabilitation consists of three (3) contracts, namely: Contract 3 – Port Harcourt – Makurdi, Contract 4 – Makurdi – Kuru, Contract 7 – Kuru – Maiduguri.  There is also the Modernization Project like in Contract (1) (Idu – Kaduna), SURE-P also focuses on the completion of core road projects by the Federal Ministry of Works, spread across the six geo-political zones of Nigeria.


On his dissatisfaction with SURE-P, the Chairman of the joint Committee, Senator Magnus Abe, PDP, Rivers South-East said, “From the details presented before us here, it is believed that the performance of your 2012 budget was put at only 31 percent. You have to sit up in 2013; else, Nigerians will start losing interest in you.  Our fears are not with your credibility, but the fact that these main roads are the same also awarded by the Federal Ministry of Works during this period. The committee said however that unless the organization provides its full details of 2012 dealings, it would not debate the 2013 budget and therefore directed the chairman, Dr Christopher Kolade to furnish it with the details before it considers the next sitting date to debate on the budget.

It has also been alleged that SURE-P is well intentioned programme but is being poeticized and given a bad name by opposition politicians and that some APC states are not giving SURE-P enough public awareness in their domain yet they draw huge amount of money every month from the proceeds from the subsidy removal. They keep quiet about the gains accruing from partial fuel subsidy removal, whereas state and local governments appropriate funds from subsidy removal on a monthly basis and the federal government is ploughing back its own portion into various states and the local governments through SURE-P.

As a result the management of the Subsidy Re-investment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) has become a subject of accusation and counter-accusation between the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN). Cleric and politician, the General Overseer of Latter Rain Assembly, Pastor Tunde Bakare said SURE-P is another drain pipe of the country’s economy embarked upon by President Goodluck Jonathan.
Bakare said: “If people are saying that PDP is sharing the subsidy reinvestment fund, I would not be surprised. If PDP does not share the money, who will? Do you think the PDP has good intentions? I felt pity for Kolade when he was appointed to head that committee. In response, a chieftain of the PDP in Ekiti State and former South-West publicity secretary of the party, Mr. Kayode Babade, said the ACN goofed on the issue at stake.  “It is nonsense for ACN to accuse PDP on a programme it did not have the fact on how it is being operated.’’  

Public Relations Officer of the SURE-P committee, Mr. Adelani Ashamu, said it was unfortunate that the ACN failed to ask its governors what they did with their 54 percent of SURE-P funds accrued to their states every month before poke nosing into that of the Federal Government activities. Ashamu pointed out that the Federal Government used its own share of SUPE-P funds (41 per cent) as an intervention on infrastructural projects like roads across the country and re-vamping of rail system.
According to former Chairman Christopher Kolade, SURE-P also started a Graduate Internship Scheme, and the Maternity and Child’s Healthcare programme. It trained about 4,000 midwives to deliver maternal services to pregnant women and to people in childbirth.

‘‘This is an intervention mechanism. People must remember that the business of government is ongoing. In fact, the area that SURE-P intervenes in does not represent the totality of government activity. For instance, we are not doing anything on housing, we are not doing anything on maritime. Government activity is going on all the time but this SURE-P money is money that was not in the normal budget. So government has decided to use it to supplement what they are doing with the normal budget. So for instance, if you take any road construction in which we have now come to intervene, what we do is to say, according to the budget of the ministry of works, how far have you gone with this road already? Let’s say the totality is 200 kilometres and they tell us they have done 70 kilometres. The question we pose is how much will your budget do in the next 12 months and they tell us they can do another 25 kilometres, we then go from that point, we now apply our own funds to continue. We don’t change contractors because that means you are doing something new, the contractors are ready to do this work, but the pace of funding has been slow, so we say to the contractors that okay, we are now going to12 months give you more money, so although you have said you will do only 95, how far can you go if we are able to give you another N40 billion? And they say in the next 12 months we can do another 50 kilometres. We are concerned with only 50 kilometres. So it’s not a duplication, it is supplementary, that is why it is an intervention,’’ he said.

A Nigerian, name with held, while criticizing SURE-P graduate internship programmes said, ‘‘3000 young people in paid N10, 000 employments for one year! What exactly is that waste of money for? What happens after the one year? What kind of short sighted policy is that? after almost an identical spend during the poverty alleviation scheme. How about set up loans - or guarantee loans for green - field business, so that actual businesses can start and employ this youths for periods far in excess of one year and still pay back to the government?  Money given to companies to employ youths for internship programme - who thought up this scheme? What happens after the government stops paying the money? Was there any form of policy analysis before this was adopted? How about an easier to manage and less prone to corruption, tax breaks for companies that employ Nigerian graduates. It is less prone to my paying my cronies for fiction internships and could be managed through existing tax laws using the universities and the NYSC scheme. 

 Community members travelling around to visit road projects- really? Are these committee members trained Engineers? What would they know about the quality of a road project? What happened to the Engineers trained and employed by the Ministry of Works?’’ he quarried.   In furtherance of the mandate given to the committee, President Goodluck Jonathan early this year appointed Gen. Martin Luther Agwai (rtd) as the substantive chairman of the Subsidy Reinvestment and Empowerment Programme (SURE-P) Gen. Martin Agwai (rtd.) was until then the Deputy Chairman and Acting Chairman of SURE-P.  Dr. Kolade had resigned citing old age.  Agwai is currently the chairman of the Committee and has continued the federal government’s efforts aimed at reinvesting the subsidy removal fund into infrastructure and empowerment projects across the nation.  In the words of Ezekiel Keith, ‘‘one can only hope that the controversies will end so that meaningful progress can be achieved.’’

 
   
    


About Ojude Oba festival

 The Ojude Oba festival is an annual celebration by the Yoruba people of Ijebu-Ode, a major town in Ogun State, Southwestern Nigeria. This v...