The World
Bank has been accused of undermining human rights and has faced criticism from
local and international civil society groups over the Tanzania secondary
education quality improvement programme loan. Campaigners say approval should
not have been given without first securing a commitment from the government to
reverse its discrimination towards pregnant girls and end compulsory pregnancy
tests.
A public
notice released earlier this week by Tanzania’s education minister,
JoyceNdalichako, said: “The target [of the loan] is to reach more than 6.5
million secondary school students across the country, without discrimination
and shall include girls who drop out of school for various reasons, including
pregnancy.
“The
government is committed to ensure that they continue with their education as
prescribed in the project.”
Of the
60,000 students who drop out of secondary school every year in Tanzania, 5,500
leave due to pregnancy according to World Bank data.
Tanzania’s
ban on pregnant schoolgirls dates back to the 60s. Amid renewed criticism, it
was reaffirmed in a 2017 speech by Tanzania’s president, John Magufuli, who
stated that “as long as I am president … no pregnant student will be allowed to
return to school. We cannot allow this immoral behaviour to permeate our
primary and secondary schools.”
Human rights
lawyer Judy Gitau, regional coordinator at Equality Now, welcomed Ndalichako’s
declaration and said she was “cautiously optimistic” about “the first time the
government of Tanzania has publicly announced in an official state document
that it will include pregnant girls in secondary school education”
But Elín
Martinez, senior researcher at Human Rights Watch, said the Tanzanian
government’s positionremained unchanged. She referred to a recent tweet in
Swahili from Tanzania’s chief government spokesperson that indicated the
government has set up parallel systems for pregnant girls.
“Tanzania
will continue to arbitrarily deny pregnant girls the right to study in formal
public primary and secondary schools – and they will only have an option of studying
in a parallel system, which will now be built using the World Bank’s loan,”
said Martínez, adding that the “alternative education pathways” only offer a
condensed version of the curriculum, and at a cost.
The World
Bank has “undermined its own commitment to non-discrimination and to improving
the lives of ‘marginalised groups,’” she said.
Source: The Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment